What I thought about Google's move

原文在此

Google moved

Since earlier today, Google has been redirecting its China based search engine to Hong Kong. This is a reasonable move in face of China’s continuous Internet censorship. Born in the 1980s I still have at least 50 years (according to the male average age data of China) to watch where China will go, but currently I feel confused and worry because now it is a critical period for China to positively answer to this question.

I am reluctant to accept the view that the Chinese government as well as all the Chinese people are genetically unwise and doom to stupidity, or that they believe in tyranny like the North Korean seem to be. In my opinion, what China is facing is somewhat worse than the Muslin world — lack of its own idealism in face of the dominating western value. Although China seems happy to follow many western wisdom in economical and social management but it does not lose its cultural root however successful the Internet censorship is. I myself have observed everyday the Chinese netizens criticizing the government not based on western values (which should be more effective) but old Chinese values (which leads to irony). They are immune to loyalty to God, law, or anything that keep every westerners happy with their lives. They feel uncomfortable to live like the westerns, as what you may often see in various Chinese town or Chinese neighborhood in the western world. Unlike the fact of the US and what’s claimed by the Chinese government, there is only one major race in China — the Chinese people.

The administrative problems we suffer everyday in our country effectively tune down most of our uncertainty of value, which will not otherwise disappear if we would remove the current ruling power. An honest survey among all the Chinese about their believes will not yield one obvious result but an even distribution covering very conflicting ends. The value we once affirmatively believe in has been removed, for more than one time, since the end of Qing Dynasty. Democracy based on free market economy advocated by Sun Yat-sen finally led to malicious capitalism and warlords. The temporary stable Chiang Kai-shek government lost the Chinese people not because the attack of Communists but its own corruption. The success of Mao Zhedong was not his talent but his deep understanding of the ultimate pursuit of all Chinese people, petty farmers. He, however, also failed in believing too much in this understanding and reluctant to change the petty-farmer consciousness in the modernization process. The Cultural Revolution was his final trial to design a new culture to meet the future development of China, which have proved wrong. The wisdom of Deng Xiaoping in his period of Chinese history is put all the idealistic controversy away and focused on economic renaissance by all means, including western means, until June 1989. The disproportionation of the 1989 Movement for Democracy told him that China was not and will never prepared for fundamentalistic liberalism. Strengthened censorship and huge economical achievement guarded and guided China to the 21st century, to a critical point when we can not continue putting away the problem of idealism.

We have reached this point since Microsoft tighten up the genuine software licensing technology. But it also lack the courage of Google to stop the Chinese people from profiting from the western way of production and industry while keeping their own customs and culture. Although Hu Jintao and his government have promised to “deepen the reform of political institution and extend the coverage of democracy”, in a world of globalization today, the situation cannot be more urgent and worrying.

另,Google违反的是这条法律:

新闻点评

新闻点评之前我要先评一下“新闻点评”这回事。明明事情就发生了一回,新闻报道出来,记者首先要写个“手记”,网站上要显示“网友评论”,“顶/踩”,然后N个电视台上面就有N!个油嘴滑舌的主持人“拍案”,第二天报纸评论版充斥着“社论”、“时评”、“来论”、“个论”等等,而且“读者”也“来信选登”一下。众BBS、博客、微博疯狂转载锐推,GReader共享Buzz跟帖。年度还要“风云”“十大”盘点一番。这是为什么呢?因为大家都追求一种居高临下对其他人其他事评头品足的那种快感——“最后得听我的”,那是一种精英主义的快感,不是精英又想当精英,但又恨现在的精英因此不得不顶草根。一但“点评”起“新闻”来,无论谁都会立马以为自己就是百家讲坛上的易中天,别的不管,主要就是神气!心理那叫一个平衡……其次就是钱,一件事情,登在一份报纸上,只卖一块钱;但如果像上述这么去整,也许就能带动一亿的GDP。世界上每天发生这么多事,这得带动多少亿啊!最明显的一个例子就是,这事情本来是人家报社做的“独家”,你本报登个“评论”,于是也沾光了,本博客恶搞一下,流量也上去了。GDP的简便提升方法就是先发骚,引众中国人围观,然后收门票。谁让中国人这么爱围观呢?而且还不够爱,必须更爱,无止境地增加对“围观”的热爱。因为“围观欲”的原因是精神空虚,所以整个文化产业的发财增值之道就是让受众在“精神空虚”方面不断掀开新的高潮,夺取新的胜利。

用低毒农药也能毒死你

新闻:甲胺磷复活记

杜凤沛也将农药比喻为汽车:每年死于车祸的人肯定比死于农药中毒的人要多得多。但是,买车用车的人依然在增加,因为人们知道车祸的起因大多是人造成的而非汽车本身。这也适用于农药,合理的使用农药可以提高产量,并且将危害控制在极低的范围之内。“所以,农药的使用绝不仅仅是高毒就禁止,禁止就认为它罪大恶极,丝毫不顾它在农业生产中的价值。”杜凤沛说,“当然,更重要的是需要发展环境更加友好,低毒高效的农药,这样才能为人类保护和改造环境发挥了重要作用。”

对于公众的农药恐惧心理,杜凤沛教授表示,农药恐惧,是被误导了。“药物帅筛选过程与医药研发是一样的,是经过了千锤百炼的。”

看完这段话我的脑海里就就已经浮现了成千上万的网友声讨“叫兽”的高潮,各大论坛都出现了“人肉无良教授”的召唤帖并且无一例外的一呼百应,某句话被广泛恶搞。大家又娱乐了一回。

首先,网友完全不相信说“高毒农药只要使用得当就安全”,因为这是砖家叫兽说的话。而且就算不知道说这话的是砖家教兽,这话本身听起来就像砖家教兽说的话。谁如果说这句话,他不是砖家教兽就是砖家教兽的走狗。

其次,就没有其次了。

所以罪不在使用不当,所以就可以使用不当,所以就可以用低毒农药毒死人,成为一种新潮的安乐死。

发明一种“没有形象”的工程来做就可以了

新闻:风电被工信部官员指形象工程 酒泉各方齐喊冤

工信部副部长苗圩参加湖北团小组讨论时,认为我国风沙伴存,风电设备受风沙磨损大,上马太多风电项目不符合国情,“特别是甘肃那个千万千瓦级的风力发电站”。……

赵冬生认为,解决风电设备被风沙袭击的问题并不是什么难题,顶多就多一些劳保设备而已,每年也就比其他无风沙的地方多出100元钱。

先不说这可能是甘肃方面塞钱给NBD记者写的软文,有趣的点在于,如何反驳别人指责你“形象工程”?什么样的工程是形象工程?工程形象美好,“西部陆上三峡”,有形象工程的嫌疑;如果工程搞砸了,形象扫地,又有形象工程的嫌疑。要证明一个工程不是“形象工程”,是要证明本工程搞砸了好呢还是没搞砸好呢?还是干脆证明本工程是LHC撞出来的暗物质——没有形象?的确啊,那台LHC无论搞砸没搞砸,都是形象工程,除非它成功砸出暗物质来。

如何举一反三?

西华一小学生被疑偷钱 一怒之下自断手指证清白

“我们要举一反三,在全镇学校开展一次法制和德育大教育活动。”张瑞锋说。

猪为何频说人话?

时评:食用油行业缘何乱象频生?

光看标题就行了。现在为了吸引眼球,越来越使用疑问句,跟《知音》杂志似的,就差没有写成“食用油乱象频生为哪般”了。让人首先的反应就是“是吗?有吗?我都还怎么不知道,你就已经在问‘为何’了?难道是我out了?”然后为了不土不落后于时代,就算主题再不感兴趣,也不得不看一下,恶补一下——毕竟人家都已经到了问“为何”的阶段了,你连知道都不知道一下,实在太out了吧!因此无论多么无聊的事情,甚至是根本不存在的事情,只要你一步到位直接去问“为何”,那就好像已经核实,非常重大了。所以虽然没听说过猪讲人话,但直接问“猪为何频说人话”,读者就会不好意思还在那里问“有吗?我怎么没听说过?”因为这样很逊,于是大家也就失去了核实事件的冲动,直接听你废话了。这是制造假新闻的手段,所以才狂被《知音》杂志使用。