Category Archives: 个人生活

与专业无关的内容。

Teletubbies

我觉得Teletubbies在的Wikipedia的介绍实在太搞笑了!

The programme features four colourful characters: Tinky Winky, Dipsy, Laa-Laa and Po who live in a futuristic dome (the “Tubbytronic Superdome”), set in a landscape of rolling hills. The environment is dotted with unusually talkative flowers and periscope-like “voice trumpets”. The only natural fauna are rabbits (although birds are often heard, particularly blackcaps and wrens). The climate is always sunny and pleasant save for occasional inclement days, with rain and puddles, and snow at Christmas time.

The Teletubbies are played by actors dressed in bulky costumes, although the sets are designed to give no sense of scale. The costumes vaguely resemble large spacesuits, although the Tubbies appear not to wear real clothes. They are instead furry, and have metallic silver-azure rectangular “screens” adorning their abdomens. These screens are used to segue into short film sequences, which are generally repeated at least once. When the series is shown in different countries around the world, the film inserts are to be tailored to suit local audiences. (The British inserts are default).

The Teletubbies have the body proportions, behaviour and language of toddlers. The pacing and design of the show was developed by cognitive psychologist Andrew Davenport, who structured the show to fit the attention spans of the target audience. The repetition of practically every word is familiar to everyone who has ever worked with young children. There was also help from Shatarra Willis the stage manager who helped the show to become a success.

The Teletubbies speak in a gurgling baby language which is the subject of some controversy among educationalists, some of whom argue that this supposedly made-up talk is not good for children. (A similar complaint was made forty years previously about another children’s series, Flower Pot Men). Tubbies are at the stage of understanding speech but not yet fully capable of articulating it, exactly like their target audience. They often simply groan in disapproval in situations where a human toddler would throw a tantrum. The Teletubbies’ catch-phrases are Eh-oh (hello), as in: Eh-oh, Laa-Laa, to which Laa-Laa will respond, Eh-oh, [other Tubby’s name]; “Uh-oh”, a common toddler response to anything untoward; “Run away! Run away!”, especially from Dipsy; and “Bye-bye” at least four times in a row. Laa-Laa, when flustered, will explode with “Bibberly cheese!”, which is as angry as they get. Perhaps the most common exclamation, however, is “Big hug!” which one or more of the Teletubbies will invariably call for during the course of an episode, resulting in an enthusiastic group hug.

All the Teletubbies say “Bye-Bye” three times. The narrator bids each Teletubby goodbye, and they disappear, but reappear a moment later saying “Boo!”. The narrator then says “No”, and proceeds to say goodbye to each Teletubby again. The sun is then shown setting, and the Teletubbies each say goodbye again, before jumping down a hole in the roof of their house. Finally, one Teletubby says goodbye a fourth time- they pop out of a hole in the house and say “Bye-bye!”. For special episodes, and at the end of the “Fun With The Teletubbies” cassette, all four Teletubbies say “Bye-bye” in this way. Many of the occurrences of the show, including the end sequence, and the scene preceding the short film broadcast on a characters tummy were shot only once, and the same scenes are used in each episode.

The surreal environment is an evocation of a toddler’s perception of the world, where they are ordered about and told to go to sleep, while wonderful and mysterious things happen without explanation. A prominent feature of each episode is a radiant sun that has an image of a smiling baby superimposed upon it. The baby in the sun occasionally laughs out loud in short bursts. To adults the laughter does not seem to be in response to any stimulus or humorous developments in the plot line of the episode.

The Teletubbies’ diet seems to consist exclusively of Tubby Custard (which is sucked through a spiral straw bowl) and Tubby Toast (circular toast with a smiley face on it). One of their companions is the Noo-Noo, a sentient, self-propelled vacuum cleaner.

Machines like the Noo-Noo, voice trumpets, and the televisions in the Teletubbies’ stomachs were designed to show small children, who are born into a world surrounded by strange and powerful electronic gadgets, that technology is benevolent and helpful, not something to be afraid of.

下面贴出相关视频:



我的一些很右的倾向

遇到一个中国版的政治倾向测试,发现我左得很低调(才0.6分),陶洪左得很彻底(1.0x分)。经过一思二思,的确发现我有一些很右很右的倾向;不过再经三思,又大惑不解。盖因这是一个中国版的政治测试,其“左”“右”的概念是中国化了的。

首先就是好像民粹主义和精英主义都很右,因为什么呢?就因为他们都是洋词儿。这样一来,专制也是右(精英治土人),民主自由也是右(土人自治)。

其次就是关于法律的观点。法治这东西很洋化很西方很右吧?但是许霆案里你如何右法?你支持法治的话,你就是不支持许霆,不支持百姓,不民粹不民主,左得很呢!我就是因为左才支持法治的。我支持恶法也得守,法律就是统制工具,就是用来治你们这些民的。够专制了吧?够左了吧?

于是发现这种测试很无聊,测不出什么来的。

再就是,陶洪居然同意多党制,靠……

再就是同性恋对社会有没有害,在这一点上我是个大右派——强烈认为无害。

我是非常纯的精英主义者,我比法西斯还法西斯。我认为遗传残疾不允许有后代。人是螺丝钉,是细胞,随时为集体利益牺牲。只不过,精英是神经元细胞——智者,土人是血红细胞——民工。一群只顾自己的芸芸众生是毫无希望的,这是“兴,百姓苦;亡,百姓苦”之根源。与其让其自生自灭还不如让我来一把火烧掉落得个耳根清静。

2008年的雷锋还是愚民工具吗?

关于雷锋

又到了一年一度的骂雷锋日了。有一个SB,叫冉云飞。去年骂了一下,今年又来。他不爽基本因为雷锋代表着愚民的工具,学雷锋者则为一些被愚至很爽之民。我不知道为什么在二十一世纪的今天,他不学雷锋还会受到某种道德谴责以至如此不爽?又或者没有?

至少他认为雷锋除了是愚民工具之外就什么都不是了,应该摒弃之并永远埋葬。

我去年也了关于雷锋的一篇文章,列出了不同时代关于学雷锋的口号。的确,不同的政治气氛下口号是不一样的,都是为政治服务的。学雷锋一度是愚民的工具。不过,在2008年如果还有像冉SB这种人,那就是一堆专制恐惧症患者,充满了濒临精神崩溃时的歇斯底里,这种人,同情一下就过去了。

又或者,彭雷兄给说上几句?

关于道德

这里涉及到道德的问题。在这里很不严肃暂时地把话题从雷锋转到“艳照门”去。某期《一虎一席谈》以艳照门为专题,请来了李银河和某律师。该律师痛心疾首地对艳照门主角进行道德谴责,并对今天社会道德的不断沦丧感到忧心忡忡。我看,从逻辑的角度上说,冉云飞应该就要站到李银河一线,与这位律师针锋相对了。翻开文化人类学研究,可以发现人在原始状态下,不仅乱婚重婚近亲结婚,而且还人吃人。后来,是谁告诉我们要一夫一妻,要从一而终?是谁告诉我们杀猪可以杀人就不行的?说道德是统治阶级进行愚民的软工具可能太过偏激,但至少是社会发展过程中,成年文化为了保卫自身在社会文化的地位而建立的某种东西,一个时期的道德,不过是当下的成年人守则罢了。不管什么历史时期,在道德上,成年群体总是有相当一部分人对年轻人的道德状态大摇其头。可是道德标准的变迁却随着历史车轮以不为人意志而转移的步阀变迁。可见道德无非也是一种充满工具主义的东西,至于是统治工具,还是某种更宽泛范畴下的工具,已经不是重点了。很显然,成年文化之所以会极立维护既有道德,是因为他们已经失去变化的活力,他们已经不能依靠变化而巩固其地位了。

其实这是个事物发展过程中新事物代替旧事物的问题。旧事物维护自己地位的时候,经常使用的招术就是告诉大家,如果没有了旧的东西,就什么都没有了,因此旧的东西再不好也要一直保留。具体到道德问题也是如此,很多人会跟你说,如果放弃了某些东西,这个社会就要充斥着可怕的不伦不类。而实际上,这样的情况如果不是从来没有发生过,至少是从来没有持续过。

就算是谈统治工具,我们也要有勇气看到其积极的一面。要有勇气看到,在历史上,各种思想上的统治在客观上成就了一定时期的文化,有很多还是光辉的文化。很多当时是愚民的说教,在今天被当作了宝贵的文化遗产。当然,我们可以清醒,也应该清醒。事实上今天很多学者不断地向我们指出以前的这些光辉文化其实不过是当时的愚民工具罢了,大有誓摘其光环之势,其实还是专制恐惧症的症状,歇斯底里发作罢了。

恐惧和恐惧症不同。恐惧症是病态的恐惧。我们应该恐惧专政,恐惧野蛮落后的统治,但是歇斯底里并不利于我们远离我们所恐惧的东西。